Pursuant to C.G.S. §33-820(a)(4), all property owned by, and all contract rights possessed by the plaintiff bank were vested in its successor following the merger of the banks and the trial court was not required to hold an evidentiary hearing with respect to a motion to substitute the successor bank as plaintiff in this foreclosure proceeding.
New Alliance Bank v. Schaeppi
Connecticut Appellate Court
November 12, 2012
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.