Connecticut Law Tribune

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Thompson v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.

U.S. District Court

November 26, 2012

For a product to qualify as "unreasonably dangerous" it must be dangerous to an extent beyond that contemplated by an ordinary consumer who purchases it, with ordinary knowledge about the product's characteristics.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions