The mere presence of unidentified DNA, in addition to the defendant's DNA on evidence, did not render the evidence that his DNA was present irrelevant or nonprobative; the presence of the other DNA was a matter for the jury's consideration.
Font Size: 
State v. Morgan
Connecticut Appellate Court
January 21, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.
