For claims under Connecticut General Statutes §22a-16, the plaintiff was required to prove that the conduct of the defendants, alone or in combination with others, very likely caused not merely a de minimis pollution, impairment or destruction of a natural resource, but an unreasonable one.
Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. Alves
Connecticut Appellate Court
January 21, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.