Connecticut Law Tribune

Font Size: increase font decrease font

Trosan v. Velky

Superior Court

February 11, 2013

Only under the most compelling circumstances may the court set aside the jury verdict because to do so interferes with a litigant's constitutional right in appropriate cases to have the issues of fact decided by a jury," pursuant to Hunte v. Amica Mutual Insurance Co., a 2002 decision of the Connecticut Appellate Court.

This article requires premium access

This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.

 
About ALM  |  About Law.com  |  Customer Support  |  Reprints  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms & Conditions