Allegations that corrections officials disciplined a prisoner who used an item of his religious faith, denied his request for religious oils, foods and books and refused to permit him to participate in religious services, can be sufficient to allege a substantial burden on the exercise of religion, in violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act.
Shakur v. Bruno
U.S. District Court
February 25, 2013
This article requires premium access
This article requires premium access to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or subscribe to read the full text.