Builder's risk and other first-party coverages have traditionally excluded loss or damage caused by "faulty workmanship." A principal point of contention in litigation over this exclusion has been whether the exclusion applies to loss or damage caused by a finished product (damage to a desk when a poorly made ceiling falls on it) or the process of workmanship (damage to a windowsill during the process of repairing the window), or to both. In light of recent decisional law, courts appear less inclined to draw a distinction between process and product as a way of limiting the reach of the "faulty workmanship" exclusion.
Font Size:
![]()
Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith Litigation
The Faulty Workmanship Exclusion
The Connecticut Law Tribune
November 21, 2012
This article requires free registration
This article requires free registration to Connecticut Law Tribune. Please sign in or register to read the full text.


