Editorial: Judicial Assistance To Self-Represented Litigants

The Connecticut Law Tribune

   |1 Comments

Last year, the Conference of Chief Justices and the Conference of State Court Administrators passed a joint resolution recommending the adoption by state courts of alternative model language for Rule 2.2 of the Model Code of Judicial Conduct specifically referring to self-represented litigants (SRLs).

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Peter Szymonik

    The above approach, while notable, represents little more than a Band-Aid to try and cover up a much larger issue and problem. That issue and problem being that the court systems in this country and the legal industry have simply failed to understand and respond to the dramatic impact the implosion of Wall Street has had on main stream America. The money that used to fuel the operational dysfunction in many court systems is now gone. What this means is that people can no longer afford attorneys or proper legal representation. Lawyers are closing up shop across the country, and more and more corporations are working to avoid the court system in favor of arbitration - given how slow, costly and completely ineffective our courts have become.

    Nowhere is this more glaringly evident than in many states "family" court systems - where in states like Connecticut, New York and New Jersey, over 80% of all litigants are now Pro Se, bringing the courts to the state of crisis and complete breakdown as families are bankrupted and children suffer due to the resulting court delays. All of this magnifying the inherent operational dysfunction and corruption in these courts.

    Until the legal system in this country comes to grips with the reality of main street America, and Chief State Justices and legislatures show the courage to institute much needed legal reform and address corruption in courthouses, public and corporate confidence, faith, and use of the court system will continue to deteriorate rapidly - and this is no one's best interests.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202621642621

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.